diff --git a/scipost/templates/scipost/EdCol_by-laws.html b/scipost/templates/scipost/EdCol_by-laws.html
index 32dd0f2298f907d1f62f51a912f84d45b769ab76..78bfc8bd65e935958935ee72820002e474e42ee9 100644
--- a/scipost/templates/scipost/EdCol_by-laws.html
+++ b/scipost/templates/scipost/EdCol_by-laws.html
@@ -441,10 +441,15 @@
</p>
<p>
If voting Fellows disagree with the recommendation, they are asked to specify
- which recommendation(s) they would have supported.
- A voting Fellow can thus disagree with a recommendation to publish and
- specify that they think the paper should be rejected. Alternately,
- the voting Fellow might also think that a higher-grade recommendation would
+ which recommendation(s) they would have supported; they can alternately
+ specify that they think previous referees should be reconsulted, or that
+ new referees should be found (this can happen in particular when a voting
+ Fellow disagrees with a direct recommendation).
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ For example, a voting Fellow can thus disagree with a recommendation to
+ publish and specify that they think the paper should be rejected. Alternately,
+ the voting Fellow might think that a higher-grade recommendation would
be more appropriate: a voting Fellow can thus disagree with a
recommendation for publication in a flagship journal because they
deem the paper to be appropriate for Selections.
diff --git a/submissions/constants.py b/submissions/constants.py
index c2a8fe93ca3c2a7cbea9aef0f24982e2e67e718d..ed406a32e6a37efa5ed36bcec4f689e35403c0cb 100644
--- a/submissions/constants.py
+++ b/submissions/constants.py
@@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ EVENT_TYPES = (
)
-
# Editorial recommendations
EIC_REC_PUBLISH = 1
EIC_REC_MINOR_REVISION = -1
@@ -210,6 +209,20 @@ EIC_REC_CHOICES = (
(EIC_REC_REJECT, 'Reject'),
)
+
+# Alternative recommendations
+ALT_REC_RECONSULT_REFEREES = -4 # can be used as alternative to direct recommendation
+ALT_REC_SEEK_ADDITIONAL_REFEREES = -5
+ALT_REC_CHOICES = (
+ (EIC_REC_PUBLISH, 'Publish'),
+ (ALT_REC_RECONSULT_REFEREES, 'Reconsult previous referees'),
+ (ALT_REC_SEEK_ADDITIONAL_REFEREES, 'Seek additional referees'),
+ (EIC_REC_MINOR_REVISION, 'Ask for minor revision'),
+ (EIC_REC_MAJOR_REVISION, 'Ask for major revision'),
+ (EIC_REC_REJECT, 'Reject'),
+)
+
+
# Tiering
TIER_I = 1
TIER_II = 2
diff --git a/submissions/forms.py b/submissions/forms.py
index 54619bfdc4ec21dea6575ecc9ac89c3120b3221d..61b1e53656ee8e925f115ec90fadc0fa60b297d7 100644
--- a/submissions/forms.py
+++ b/submissions/forms.py
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ from .constants import (
SUBMISSION_CYCLE_CHOICES,
REPORT_PUBLISH_1, REPORT_PUBLISH_2, REPORT_PUBLISH_3,
REPORT_MINOR_REV, REPORT_MAJOR_REV, REPORT_REJECT,
- EIC_REC_CHOICES, SUBMISSION_TIERS,
+ ALT_REC_CHOICES, SUBMISSION_TIERS,
STATUS_VETTED, DECISION_FIXED, DEPRECATED, STATUS_COMPLETED,
STATUS_EIC_ASSIGNED, CYCLE_DEFAULT, CYCLE_DIRECT_REC, STATUS_PREASSIGNED, STATUS_REPLACED,
STATUS_FAILED_PRESCREENING, STATUS_DEPRECATED,
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ class RecommendationVoteForm(forms.Form):
)
alternative_recommendation = forms.ChoiceField(
label='Which action do you recommend?',
- widget=forms.Select, choices=EIC_REC_CHOICES,
+ widget=forms.Select, choices=ALT_REC_CHOICES,
required=False)
remark = forms.CharField(widget=forms.Textarea(attrs={
'rows': 3,
diff --git a/submissions/migrations/0075_auto_20191017_1942.py b/submissions/migrations/0075_auto_20191017_1942.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e5ddd52a6e9bd6d4e461caef75c644987e7b98c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/submissions/migrations/0075_auto_20191017_1942.py
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Generated by Django 2.1.8 on 2019-10-17 17:42
+
+from django.db import migrations, models
+
+
+class Migration(migrations.Migration):
+
+ dependencies = [
+ ('submissions', '0074_auto_20191017_0949'),
+ ]
+
+ operations = [
+ migrations.AlterField(
+ model_name='alternativerecommendation',
+ name='recommendation',
+ field=models.SmallIntegerField(choices=[(1, 'Publish'), (-4, 'Reconsult previous referees'), (-5, 'Seek additional referees'), (-1, 'Ask for minor revision'), (-2, 'Ask for major revision'), (-3, 'Reject')]),
+ ),
+ ]
diff --git a/submissions/models.py b/submissions/models.py
index 3885b3d1d3ea3fdc8be816624d367e8484103d74..ae117d25d2446efa72c27c4058d57fc9fea16741 100644
--- a/submissions/models.py
+++ b/submissions/models.py
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ from .constants import (
SUBMISSION_CYCLES, CYCLE_DEFAULT, CYCLE_SHORT, DECISION_FIXED, ASSIGNMENT_STATUSES,
CYCLE_DIRECT_REC, EVENT_GENERAL, EVENT_TYPES, EVENT_FOR_AUTHOR, EVENT_FOR_EIC, REPORT_TYPES,
REPORT_NORMAL,
- EIC_REC_CHOICES, SUBMISSION_TIERS,
+ EIC_REC_CHOICES, ALT_REC_CHOICES, SUBMISSION_TIERS,
STATUS_DRAFT, STATUS_VETTED, EIC_REC_STATUSES, VOTING_IN_PREP, STATUS_UNASSIGNED,
STATUS_INCORRECT, STATUS_UNCLEAR, STATUS_NOT_USEFUL, STATUS_NOT_ACADEMIC, DEPRECATED,
STATUS_FAILED_PRESCREENING, STATUS_RESUBMITTED, STATUS_REJECTED, STATUS_WITHDRAWN, REPORT_REC,
@@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ class AlternativeRecommendation(models.Model):
eicrec = models.ForeignKey('submissions.EICRecommendation', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
fellow = models.ForeignKey('scipost.Contributor', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
for_journal = models.ForeignKey('journals.Journal', on_delete=models.CASCADE)
- recommendation = models.SmallIntegerField(choices=EIC_REC_CHOICES)
+ recommendation = models.SmallIntegerField(choices=ALT_REC_CHOICES)
class iThenticateReport(TimeStampedModel):
diff --git a/submissions/templates/submissions/pool/recommendation.html b/submissions/templates/submissions/pool/recommendation.html
index 76267030293bac227d50f9272a1d9ada3e3a66e9..10b57af2fbd161c5f02e84c54e6bfb73bbb7f402 100644
--- a/submissions/templates/submissions/pool/recommendation.html
+++ b/submissions/templates/submissions/pool/recommendation.html
@@ -223,7 +223,11 @@
<p>You had previously voted <span class="text-danger">{{ previous_vote }}</span>; you can use the form below to change your vote and/or add a remark:</p>
{% endif %}
<form action="{% url 'submissions:vote_on_rec' rec_id=recommendation.id %}" method="post">
- <p id="agree_instructions"><strong class="text-success">If you agree with a recommendation to publish, you can provide your ballpark quality tiering below</strong><br>(this is not compulsory, but most welcome)</p>
+ <p id="agree_instructions">
+ {% if recommendation.recommendation == 1 %}
+ <strong class="text-success">If you agree with a recommendation to publish, you can provide your ballpark quality tiering below</strong><br>(this is not compulsory, but most welcome)
+ {% endif %}
+ </p>
<p id="disagree_instructions" class="text-danger"><strong>If you vote disagree, please provide an alternative recommendation below</strong></p>
{% csrf_token %}
{{ voting_form|bootstrap }}