Correct typos; debug NatPhys doi data harvesting

commentaries/views.py

@@ -122,7 +122,10 @@ def prefill_using_DOI(request):
                 for author in doiqueryJSON['message']['author'][1:]:
                     authorlist += ', ' + author['given'] + ' ' + author['family']
                 journal = doiqueryJSON['message']['container-title'][0]
-                volume = doiqueryJSON['message']['volume']
+                try:
+                    volume = doiqueryJSON['message']['volume']
+                except:
+                    volume = ''
                 pages = ''
                 try:
                     pages = doiqueryJSON['message']['article-number'] # for Phys Rev

scipost/templates/scipost/FAQ.html

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
       <h3>Why should I submit my manuscripts to SciPost?</h3>
       <p>Because:</p>
       <ul>
-	<li>you think your work can withstand the stringest form of pre-publication scrutiny: <a href="/FAQ#pwr">peer-witnessed refereeing</a></li>
+	<li>you think your work can withstand the strictest form of pre-publication scrutiny: <a href="/FAQ#pwr">peer-witnessed refereeing</a></li>
 	<li>you want your referees to have to adhere to the same standards of professionalism which are expected of you as an author</li>
 	<li>you want the editorial process to be handled by professional scientists</li>
 	<li>you think that copyright should be held by authors, not publishers</li>
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
       <hr class="hr6">
       <h3>Will my papers always be available?</h3>
       <p>Yes. SciPost is here to stay, and authors should not worry that their SciPost publications could potentially disappear. 
-	SciPost has institutional backing guaranteeing perennity of access to its journals database.
+	SciPost has institutional backing guaranteeing perpetuity of access to its journals database.
       </p>
       <br/>
       <div class="flex-greybox">
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@
       <br/>
       <hr class="hr6">
       <h3>How is SciPost funded?</h3>
-      <p>SciPost operates non-commercially, encurring minimal costs. Contributors, who are by definition all academically employed, provide all the content and perform all editorial tasks as part of their normal institutional academic duties. Operations are kept running by a team of volunteer officers, themselves academically employed.</p>
+      <p>SciPost operates non-commercially, incurring minimal costs. Contributors, who are by definition all academically employed, provide all the content and perform all editorial tasks as part of their normal institutional academic duties. Operations are kept running by a team of volunteer officers, themselves academically employed.</p>
       <p>Support for operational costs is initially provided by the <a href="http://www.nwo.nl/en">NWO</a> in the Netherlands. Long-term operations will be financed by donations from national funding agencies, universities, societies, foundations and individuals. If you are interested in financially supporting SciPost, <a href="mailto:J.S.Caux@uva.nl">contact us</a>.</p>
     </div>
   </div>

scipost/templates/scipost/about.html

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
     <div class="col-6">
       <p>SciPost is a complete scientific publication portal.</p>
       <p>It is purely online-based, and offers freely, openly, globally and perpetually accessible science.</p>
-      <p>Being managed by professional scientists, and making use of editor-sollicited and contributed reviews, its Journals aim at the highest achievable standards of refereeing.</p>
+      <p>Being managed by professional scientists, and making use of editor-solicited and contributed reviews, its Journals aim at the highest achievable standards of refereeing.</p>
       <p>SciPost Commentaries allow Contributors to seamlessly comment on all existing literature.</p>
     </div>
   </div>
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 	<li><em>Two-way open access</em><br/> Publicly-funded science should be openly accessible to scientists and the general public, perpetually, worldwide. Conversely, scientists should not have to pay publishing charges to disseminate the fruits of their research efforts.</li>
 	<li><em>Non-profit</em><br/>Academics do not perform research for profit, and by extension the publication of their scientific results should not involve commercial profit-making.</li>
 	<li><em>By Professionals</em><br/> Scientists should carry the final responsibility for all stages in the scientific publishing process.</li>
-	<li><em>Peer-witnessed refereeing</em><br/> Scientific publications should undergo the stringest possible peer refereeing process, witnessed by the community instead of hidden behind closed doors.</li>
+	<li><em>Peer-witnessed refereeing</em><br/> Scientific publications should undergo the strictest possible peer refereeing process, witnessed by the community instead of hidden behind closed doors.</li>
 	<li><em>Accountable and credited refereeing</em><br/> Peer refereeing should be accountable, and should be incentivized by being credited.</li>
 	<li><em>Post-publication evaluation</em><br/> Peer evaluation does not stop at the moment of publication.</li>
       </ul>

submissions/templates/submissions/author_guidelines.html

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
       <p>The bulk of the paper should be clearly divided into sections with short descriptive titles, including an introduction and a conclusion.</p>
     </li>
     <li>Figures
-      <p>If figures are included, they should only occupy the stricly necessary space, in any case individually fitting on a single page. 
+      <p>If figures are included, they should only occupy the strictly necessary space, in any case individually fitting on a single page. 
 	Each figure item should be appropriately labeled and accompanied by a descriptive caption. 
 	SciPost does not accept creative figures or artist's impressions; 
 	on the other hand, technical drawings and scientifically accurate representations are encouraged.</p>