Partial update of sub_and_ref_procedure

submissions/templates/submissions/sub_and_ref_procedure.html

@@ -30,15 +30,15 @@
         <h2>Submission</h2>
           <p>This is a quick summary. For more details, see the <a href="{% url 'journals:journals_terms_and_conditions' %}">SciPost Journals Terms and Conditions</a>
             and the <a href="{% url 'submissions:author_guidelines' %}">author guidelines</a>.</p>
-          <h3>To submit an article for publication in a SciPost Journal, authors must:</h3>
+          <h3>To submit an article for publication in a SciPost Journal, you must:</h3>
           <ol>
-            <li>Prepare their manuscript following the <a href="{% url 'submissions:author_guidelines' %}">author guidelines</a></li>
+            <li>Prepare your manuscript following the <a href="{% url 'submissions:author_guidelines' %}">author guidelines</a></li>
             <li>Make your preprint publicly available on an appropriate preprint server:
 	      <ul>
 		<li>Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science: <a href="http://arxiv.org">arXiv.org</a></li>
 	      </ul>
 	    </li>
-            <li>After appearance on the preprint server, fill the SciPost <a href="{% url 'submissions:submit_manuscript' %}">Submission</a> form, selecting which SciPost Journal to submit to and providing domain and speciality specifications.</li>
+            <li>After appearance on the preprint server, fill the SciPost <a href="{% url 'submissions:submit_manuscript' %}">Submission</a> form, selecting which SciPost Journal to submit to (and providing additional info such as domain and speciality specifications).</li>
           </ol>
     </div>
 </div>
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
           <ol>
             <li>
 	      <strong>Pre-screening: plagiarism and conflicts of interest</strong>
-	      <br/>The Submission is checked for plagiarism, and appropriate action (immediate rejection; request to authors for modified version) is taken if necessary. A thorough scan is performed to flag potential conflicts of interest of authors with Fellows.
+	      <br/>The Submission is checked by Editorial Administration for plagiarism and appropriate action (immediate rejection; request to authors for modified version) is taken if necessary. A thorough scan is performed to flag potential conflicts of interest of authors with Fellows.
 	    </li>
 	    <li>
 	      <strong>Screening: finding an Editor-in-charge</strong>
@@ -64,16 +64,16 @@
 	      <strong>Refereeing round</strong>
 	      <br/>The Editor-in-charge starts a refereeing round (whose duration depends on the Journal, see below), inviting specific Contributors to provide an Invited Report.
               During a refereeing round, registered Contributors to SciPost can volunteer a Contributed Report, and authors can continuously provide Replies to Reports and Comments.
-              The contents of Reports are publicly viewable, but the author of the Report can choose public anonymity (which is then known to Editors only). Authors are informed by email if a Report or a Comment on their paper is vetted through and published online (authors are welcome to respond, but should not feel obliged to do so before the refereeing round is closed).</li>
+              The contents of Reports are publicly viewable, but the author of the Report can choose public anonymity (their identity is then known to Editors only). Authors are informed by email if a Report or a Comment on their paper is vetted through and published online (authors are welcome to respond, but should not feel obliged to do so, unless the Editor-in-charge specifically requests it).</li>
             <li>
 	      <strong>Closing of the refereeing round</strong>
-	      <br/>At the end of the refereeing round, submission of Contributed Reports on the Submission Page is deactivated (reports from invited referees can still be considered, at the discretion of the Editor-in-charge). The Editor-in-charge invites the authors to finalize their responses to any submitted Reports and Comments before the Editorial Recommendation is formulated.</li>
+	      <br/>At the end of the refereeing round, submission of Contributed Reports on the Submission Page is deactivated (reports from invited referees can still be considered, at the discretion of the Editor-in-charge). If deemed appropriate, Editor-in-charge invites the authors to finalize their responses to any submitted Reports and Comments before the Editorial Recommendation is formulated.</li>
             <li>
 	      <strong>Editorial recommendation</strong>
-	      <br/>Reports, Replies and Comments are then assessed by the Editor-in-charge, who formulates an editorial recommendation.
+	      <br/>Reports, Replies and Comments are then assessed by the Editor-in-charge, who formulates an Editorial Recommendation.
               <ol>
-        	<li>If the editorial recommendation is for publication or rejection, it is forwarded to the Editorial College, which takes the binding editorial decision by consultation of the relevant specialty's Editorial Fellows (voting rights are given to at least 9 Fellows). If the recommendation is to publish the paper as Tier I (targeting approximately the top 10% of articles considered), a selection of Editorial Fellows from all specialties are given voting rights and can thus support or object to this promotion.</li>
-        	<li>If the Editorial Recommendation is for a minor or major revision, it is communicated directly to the authors, who must then resubmit. Upon resubmission, the Editor-in-charge can either start a new refereeing round or directly formulate a new editorial recommendation.</li>
+        	<li>If the Editorial Recommendation is for publication or rejection, it is forwarded to the Editorial College, which takes the binding editorial decision by consultation of the relevant specialty's Editorial Fellows (voting rights are given to at least 9 Fellows). If the recommendation is to publish the paper as Tier I (targeting approximately the top 10% of articles considered), a selection of Editorial Fellows from all specialties are given voting rights and can thus support or object to this promotion.</li>
+        	<li>If the Editorial Recommendation is for a minor or major revision, it is communicated directly to the authors, who must then resubmit. Upon resubmission, the Editor-in-charge can either start a new refereeing round or directly formulate a new Editorial Recommendation.</li>
               </ol></li>
             <li>
 	      <strong>Decision</strong>