- Jul 26, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
- Jul 24, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
- Jun 02, 2017
-
-
Jean-Sébastien Caux authored
-
- May 30, 2017
-
-
Jean-Sébastien Caux authored
-
- May 28, 2017
-
-
Jean-Sébastien Caux authored
-
- May 25, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
- May 21, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
- May 19, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
Due to the new Commentary request forms, which were also used during vetting (choice=modify), the vetting went wrong sometimes. If the vetting action was 'modify', the user was redirected to the old form which didn't exist anymore. As a result of how the contruction of this modify structure, the Commentary was first deleted and thus the data was lost. The requester did receive a mail that his/her Commentary was accessible on SciPost however. I fixed this by recontructing the vetting views. I combined the vetting list and the vet request. I removed the action removing the Commentary and made this a redirect to a new view which is a modify page accessible only for EdCol Admins to modify+accept the Commentary. Also, the mail for 'modify' vetting is also just sent at *after* modification now.
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
- May 18, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 17, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 15, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 14, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 13, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 12, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
Add tests for RequestPublishedArticleForm
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 08, 2017
-
-
Jorran de Wit authored
-
- May 07, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-
- May 06, 2017
-
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
I'm not happy with this yet. The template requires all forms to be instantiated at all times, while relying on javascript to hide them. There should just be an if-statement checking if the form object exists. That way, the error handling, which is now on the form level, will render properly and everything is much shorter.
-
Geert Kapteijns authored
-